For investors
After access approval, review cleared materials covering the business model, economics, risks and sources.
Apply → review → approval → materials → dialogueRequest accessRA LAB / FOR INVESTORS
See the potential. Understand the risks.
Explore business models, examine the evidence behind the figures and assess the risks. We help make a project’s context clear; the investment decision remains yours.
The catalogue is being developed. Access follows application review and individual approval.
Private catalogue access01Business model02Economics03Team04Risks
Choose your route
For founders
Send a short project overview. We will review it and identify missing evidence.
Overview → initial review → address gaps → decisionWhat to prepareFor strategic partners
Offer domain expertise, technology or implementation support. We will discuss your role and terms for the challenge.
Expertise → challenge → participation discussionDiscuss a partnershipWhat helps you assess a project
- Your challenge
- You need evidence for an informed conversation about a project.
- What we will do
- We will bring the business model, economics, risks and evidence status into one overview.
- What you will get
- After access approval: materials cleared for disclosure. The investment decision remains yours.
- 01Assumption
- 02Source and review
- 03Evidence and limitation
GRI / 07
How we assess growth readiness with GRI
We review seven business areas through interviews, financial data and workflows, identifying evidence, constraints and growth priorities.
- 01
Product & demand
Customer needs, actual purchases and reasons for rejection.
Which customer need already attracts willingness to pay?
- Data reviewed
- Purchases, repeat enquiries, interviews and rejection reasons.
- Potential risk
- Interest does not translate into paid demand.
- Output
- A map of demand evidence and gaps.
- 02
Trust & positioning
Value clarity, differentiation and reasons to trust.
Why does a customer choose this company?
- Data reviewed
- Value proposition, alternatives, feedback and reasons to trust.
- Potential risk
- Weak differentiation or unsupported claims.
- Output
- A testable value proposition and evidence list.
- 03
Business model
Revenue sources, costs and model sustainability as the business grows.
How is revenue generated and what changes with growth?
- Data reviewed
- Revenue sources, costs, margins and sales repeatability.
- Potential risk
- Revenue growth increases losses or operating strain.
- Output
- A model map and assumptions to validate.
- 04
Cash flow
Cash receipt timing, obligations and working capital needs.
Is cash sufficient between receipts and obligations?
- Data reviewed
- Receipt and payment timing, receivables and working capital.
- Potential risk
- Cash gaps and reliance on new funding.
- Output
- A working-capital needs and scenario map.
- 05
Operations
Repeatability, quality, lead times and operational bottlenecks.
Can results be repeated without losing quality?
- Data reviewed
- Lead times, quality, process capacity, errors and bottlenecks.
- Potential risk
- Volume grows faster than operating capacity.
- Output
- Improvement priorities and scaling constraints.
- 06
Team
Roles, capabilities, accountability and collaboration.
Who owns execution and what capabilities are missing?
- Data reviewed
- Roles, capabilities, accountability and collaboration.
- Potential risk
- Critical functions depend on one person.
- Output
- An accountability and capability-gap map.
- 07
Founder’s role
Priorities, decision-making, delegation and founder dependence.
Which decisions can be delegated while retaining control?
- Data reviewed
- Priorities, decisions, delegation and founder dependence.
- Potential risk
- The founder becomes a growth bottleneck.
- Output
- Delegation and management-change priorities.
How a project is reviewed
Scope depends on the project. Preparation does not create automatic catalogue admission.
- 01
Submission
Understand the product, stage and purpose.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- A short overview and contact.
- Output
- An application record and reference.
- Next
- Initial review
- 02
Initial review
Check fit and information completeness.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- Answers to clarification questions.
- Output
- A next-step decision or information request.
- Next
- GRI review where needed
- 03
GRI review where needed
Identify constraints across seven dimensions.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- Interviews and agreed baseline information.
- Output
- An evidence, constraint and gap map.
- Next
- Economics and risks
- 04
Economics and risks
Review metric sources, rights and use of capital.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- Agreed financial information and explanations.
- Output
- A list of assumptions and material risks.
- Next
- Material preparation
- 05
Material preparation
Structure the agreed information.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- Corrections and source evidence.
- Output
- A project profile and available-material list.
- Next
- Disclosure approval
- 06
Disclosure approval
Record permitted information and audience.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- Confirmation of rights and disclosure consent.
- Output
- A recorded materials-owner decision.
- Next
- Private catalogue
- 07
Private catalogue
Present cleared materials to approved participants.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- Confirmation that information is current.
- Output
- A profile with review date and reviewer.
- Next
- Potential dialogue
- 08
Potential dialogue
Discuss questions and potential participation.
Inputs and next step
- Founder provides
- Answers to interested participants’ questions.
- Output
- Independent decisions by the parties; no transaction is implied.
What each project status means
Under diagnosis
Baseline information is being collected and gaps clarified. The status does not establish investment readiness.
In preparation
A gap-addressing plan is agreed. Findings are still being developed; publication and financing are not promised.
Ready for presentation
Materials have been reviewed against eight criteria, with a review date and reviewer recorded. This means readiness for presentation, not an investment recommendation.
Investor discussions
Substantive discussions have begun. Terms remain under discussion; the status does not mean a transaction has closed.
RA LAB / Private catalogue
A private catalogue. More context for your decision.
Once access is approved, you can review the project materials authorised for sharing: the model, stage, economics, sources and risks. A profile provides a basis for discussion, not a recommendation to invest.
Request catalogue accessWhat our conclusions are based on
- 01Source and date for each material metric
- 02Facts distinguished from assumptions and forecasts
- 03Limitations and principal risks
- 04A named reviewer
- 05Rights to disclose materials
- 06Owner approval for publication
- 07Confidentiality and access control
- 08Independent investment decisions
Materials support an informed dialogue and do not replace independent legal, financial and investment due diligence. Listing, access approval and material preparation do not guarantee financing or returns.
A strong project starts with a clear explanation.
The initial enquiry needs your name, contact, project name, sector, geography, stage and a short overview: customer, revenue model, evidence and capital purpose. The capital amount is optional.
Do not send financial statements, third-party personal data or confidential documents through the public form. If needed, we will agree the materials and transfer method.
Submit your project- Product and target customer
- Business model and current stage
- Team and roles
- Actual metrics separated from assumptions
- Use of capital, where relevant
- Constraints, risks and available evidence
Questions before applying
Who can request access?
Private and institutional investors, and strategic partners with a professional interest in the projects. Each application is reviewed individually.
Does registration open the catalogue immediately?
No. Registration creates an application for review. Access follows individual approval.
How does sign-in work?
After approval, sign in through a ChatGPT account using the application email. Access depends on an active permission.
What does a project status mean?
It indicates preparation and review progress. It is not a return rating and does not replace the investor’s own due diligence.
Does GRI guarantee financing?
No. GRI structures a seven-dimension business review and helps identify constraints. Investment decisions are independent.
Why are there seven GRI dimensions but eight material-review criteria?
Seven dimensions describe the business. Eight criteria concern material completeness, including rights, use of capital, risks and documents. They are different review layers.
Who reviews the materials?
The RA LAB owner coordinates the review. Profiles record a reviewer and review date. Any expert involvement is agreed for the project.
Can a project be prepared before listing?
Gap-addressing work can be discussed. Scope and terms are agreed separately; preparation does not guarantee listing.
What is needed for an initial enquiry?
Contact details and a short overview of the product, customer, model, stage and purpose. Do not include confidential documents in the public form.
How can I request more documents?
A published profile lists available materials. Requests are agreed with the coordinator and materials owner.
Can I propose a technology partnership?
Yes. Describe your expertise and the type of challenge that interests you. A partnership discussion creates no investment commitment.
How can I correct or withdraw an application?
An access application can be withdrawn after sign-in. To correct details or withdraw a project application, contact the site owner and quote the application reference.
Are HONOR and 1 MLN KM investment offers?
No. They are presented as a client case and an owned laboratory. Their mention does not imply an open investment round.
How long does review take?
No fixed review timeline is currently published. Questions depend on the completeness of the initial information; an estimate is agreed after first contact.
Start with the route that fits.
Investors decide independently following their own due diligence. Catalogue materials do not replace independent legal and financial review or guarantee financing or returns.