Marina Rakhimzhanova · AI + Human Lab

Real AI value for real business

We help businesses win customers, earn repeat purchases and enter new markets. We connect strategy, customer experience and AI, then test what changes in sales, economics and the way teams work.

For investors and strategic partners
Real customersReal processesMeasurable outcomes
MARINA RA LAB / 02 ACTIVE

Projects in focus

Human × AI × Business

METHOD7 STAGES
OUTPUTEVIDENCE
PROJECTSINTERNATIONAL

Business has enough AI presentations. What it needs is evidence.

Enquiries fail to turn into payments. Customers do not return. Revenue grows, but profit does not. Before adding another tool, we find the source of the loss and choose the first change worth testing.

“

We do not start with technology. We start where a customer or a business loses time, money, trust, or an opportunity to grow.

01You need a clear starting point

Point A analysis

Your challenge
Sales or profit are not growing, and the cause is unclear.
What we will do
We will review the customer journey, data and seven GRI areas, identify the main constraint and choose what to test first.
What you will get
A priority challenge, baseline metrics and a 30 / 60 / 90-day plan with a first experiment.
What we review and the plan you receive

02You have a specific idea to test

AI pilot

Your challenge
Your team spends time on manual work. You need to understand where AI can help.
What we will do
We will compare one AI use case with the current workflow on quality, time and costs.
What you will get
Test results and a recommendation to continue, change or stop.
What we test and how we assess value

6 growth levers.
One connected system.

We find where your business loses customers, sales and cash. We design a solution around your product, audience and market, using AI to test ideas faster, improve the customer experience and understand the economics of growth.

AIStart360 methodology · Marina Rakhimzhanova ↗

AIStart360 PUBLIC LAB / CUSTOMER GROWTH LOOP

From interest to repeat purchases.

Winning a customer is only the beginning. We design an experience that delivers value early, gives people a real reason to return and helps them get more from your product. Customer experience, sales and unit economics work as one system.

Five stages. One connected product experience.
  1. Hook
  2. Aha
  3. Habit
  4. Repeat
  5. Expand
  1. 01

    InterestHook

    The customer understands which job your product solves.

    UX Research · performance

    Measure
    CAC · paid conversion
  2. 02

    First valueAha

    The team completes a first useful work task.

    UI/UX tests · first value

    Measure
    Activation · time to value
  3. 03

    Useful habitHabit

    The solution becomes part of the normal workflow.

    CJM · behavioural triggers

    Measure
    Retention 30/60/90
  4. 04

    Repeat purchaseRepeat

    The customer buys again or renews a contract.

    CRM segmentation · A/B tests

    Measure
    Repeat rate · frequency
  5. 05

    More valueExpand

    Another team uses your product to solve its own job.

    AI personalisation · bundles

    Measure
    AOV · LTV · contribution
06 · Cash flow across the customer journey
We track customer lifecycle economicsCAC · Conversion · Retention 30/60/90 · Repeat rate · AOV · average order value · LTV · customer lifetime value
CAC
Cost of acquiring a new paying customer: agreed acquisition costs / new paying customers. We compare channels on a consistent basis.
Conversion
Share of the original eligible group reaching an agreed action, such as payment. Views, enquiries and purchases are measured separately.
Retention 30/60/90
Share of the original cohort returning to useful product use in agreed 30-, 60- and 90-day windows. Returning to the product is distinct from paying again.
Repeat rate
Share of the original customer group making a repeat paid purchase within the chosen period. We also track frequency and time to the next purchase.
AOV · average order value
Paid-order revenue / number of orders over the same period, with agreed treatment of refunds and discounts. We assess margin and contribution alongside it.
LTV · customer lifetime value
Customer contribution after variable costs over an explicit horizon. We report realised contribution and forecasts separately and compare them with CAC and payback time.

For your product, we agree channels, segments, events and periods. We assess 30/60/90-day retention once the relevant cohort has matured; 21 days do not replace 90 days of observation.

How we test the result

Clicks and activity are not enough. Before a test, we define a useful customer action, a business metric and a comparison method. Afterwards, we account for costs and decide what to do next.

Interest

The customer takes a meaningful next step.

First value

The customer achieves an outcome, not merely opens the product.

Useful habit

The cohort returns to a useful activity.

Repeat purchase

There is a new payment, not just another visit.

More value

Customer contribution grows after costs and rewards.

Returning to a product and paying again are different outcomes. We measure both and relate them to a genuine customer need.

  1. 01What does the customer need?
  2. 02What blocks the next step?
  3. 03What will we change with AI?
  4. 04Which action will we measure?
  5. 05Is there profit after costs?

Customer signal → Hypothesis → Human × AI pilot → Cohort evidence → Economics → Decision

Before launch, we define a metric, timeframe and success rule. We compare with a control or similar group and account for seasonality, discounts, returns, team time and AI costs. Timing alone does not prove an AI effect.

We track CAC, conversion, 30/60/90-day retention, repeat rate, AOV and LTV by channel, segment and cohort. We agree the event, period and costs before launch. We distinguish projected LTV from realised contribution; for long cycles, observation continues after Bootcamp.

Scale

Evidence supports the effect, with acceptable economics and quality.

Iterate

There is a signal, but evidence or economics are not yet sufficient.

Stop

The decision rule is not met or guardrails are breached.

We communicate with customer consent and make opting out easy. Targets are benchmarks, not growth guarantees.

UX Research · CJM · User Journey Mapping · UI/UX testing · A/B testing · behavioural triggers · CRM segmentation · AI personalisation · performance marketing · upsell · cross-sell · bundles

Guides and examples

HONOR’s customer journey provides context for a Customer Lifecycle hypothesis, not proof of this model’s impact.

What we measureCAC · acquisition costPaid conversionRepeat purchases · retentionOrder value · contribution after costs

From a business challenge to proven impact.

From a clear challenge to a solution we can test. At every stage, you know what we are doing, what you will receive and what evidence supports the next step.

  1. 01
    About 7 days

    Point A analysis

    We identify where performance breaks down: in the product, customer decision, sales process, operations or team.

    • Interviews with the owner and team
    • Data, constraints and growth priority
    DeliverableChallenge brief and baseline metrics
  2. 02
    1 day · intensive

    GRI working session

    We choose the main constraint and turn the GRI findings into a practical action plan.

    • Key constraint and growth lever
    • Hypothesis, metric and team roles
    DeliverableGrowth roadmap and first pilot plan
  3. 03
    From 21 days + support

    Business pilot

    We run a focused change and compare its performance with the existing process.

    • Prototype, implementation and short cycles
    • Baseline comparison and cost tracking
    DeliverableMeasured effect and a pilot decision
  4. 04
    Planning guide · 9–12 months

    Repeatable growth

    We embed a successful approach in processes, responsibilities and metrics so the team can repeat it.

    • Standards, ownership and monitoring
    • Economics and a scaling plan
    DeliverableA repeatable system with clear economics

Timings are planning guides. Scope, metrics and team involvement are agreed before starting. Each phase informs the decision to proceed.

Seven steps within the methodology
  1. 01

    Challenge

    Where does the customer or business lose value?

  2. 02

    Diagnosis

    Journey, data, constraints, and baseline metrics.

  3. 03

    AI hypothesis

    What does AI do, and what remains human?

  4. 04

    Prototype

    The smallest solution capable of testing behavior.

  5. 05

    Pilot

    Work with real customers and business processes.

  6. 06

    Measurement

    Compare the outcome with the baseline.

  7. 07

    Scale

    A playbook to improve, stop, or scale the solution.

SUCCESS CRITERION

An experiment succeeds not when the AI works, but when a customer or financial outcome changes.

Discuss your starting point

Ideas you can put to work in your business.

Start with a challenge. Find a practical guide, a business case and supporting research, then test what applies to your product and market.

1 MLN KM: researching the travel experience.

Our own project explores how to help people choose a trip, plan a route and move towards booking.

1 MLN KM project illustration: travellers, mountains and a route02 / TRAVELTECH

Owned project · validating demand and business model

1 MLN KM — building an intelligent travel ecosystem

Our own project explores how to turn the desire to travel into a practical trip plan. Routes, content, community and AI come together while individual product scenarios are tested separately.

An independent project and an owned laboratory: testing demand and a commission model through travel, product and technology expertise.

AI advisorRoutesGeodataCommunity

Growth hypotheses. Tested in reality.

We investigate where AI changes customer behaviour, team performance and business economics. Every experiment begins with a real problem and supports a decision: scale, iterate or stop.

Research agenda: proposed hypotheses, not completed experiments or validated outcomes. An implemented feature does not prove its economic impact.

EXP 01Proposed hypothesis

RetailTech · HONOR

Better decisions. Better sales?

Can context-aware AI recommendations increase paid conversion without compromising margins or recommendation quality?

Primary metric
Paid conversion
HONOR case study →
How we will test it
Supporting metrics
Gross profit per visitor · Decision time
Business problem
Customers struggle to choose a suitable kit for their activity, weather and body measurements. Recommendations must help a purchase, not just sound convincing.
Comparison and test design
We will compare ordinary selection with AI-assisted selection on comparable HONOR traffic. Before launch, we will define the allocation unit, baseline conversion, sample size and rules for recording online and offline payments. We will account for inventory, seasonality and discounts; without a valid comparison, we will not attribute growth to AI.
AI and human roles
AI proposes a kit using verified product data. A consultant checks complex recommendations, availability and fit for the customer's needs.
Guardrails
Recommendation errors, returns and margins. Stop if errors or returns increase beyond the agreed limits.
Decision after the test
We expand selection only when paid conversion improves meaningfully while quality and economics hold. If evidence is insufficient, we extend observation or change the hypothesis.
EXP 02Proposed hypothesis

Customer lifecycle · HONOR

From first purchase to lifetime value.

Can AI personalisation grounded in real customer needs increase profitable repeat purchases?

Primary metric
Repeat purchase rate
HONOR customer system →
How we will test it
Supporting metrics
Incremental margin · Reactivation cost
Business problem
A history of purchases and fittings does not itself bring customers back. We need a useful offer at the right moment.
Comparison and test design
We will compare similar buyer cohorts receiving personalised offers or standard service. We will define the repeat-purchase window in advance and account for returns. Observation will last 90–180 days or longer, depending on the purchase cycle.
AI and human roles
AI proposes the next relevant contact. A staff member checks the offer and contact frequency. Communications require appropriate customer consent.
Guardrails
Unsubscribes, complaints, returns and discount costs. Unprofitable discount-driven purchases do not count as success.
Decision after the test
We identify which personalised offers create additional profitable purchases and justify their costs.
EXP 03Proposed hypothesis

TravelTech · 1 MLN KM

From inspiration to trusted itineraries.

Can AI turn travel inspiration into a verified itinerary that users are willing to adopt?

Primary metric
Validated itinerary acceptance
1 MLN KM laboratory →
How we will test it
Supporting metrics
Planning time · Critical error rate
Business problem
Interest in a destination still leaves questions about time, budget, accessibility and reliable information.
Comparison and test design
Once a working prototype is confirmed, compare independent planning and AI assistance on identical tasks. Count an itinerary as accepted only if the user selects it and it passes material constraint checks.
AI and human roles
AI assembles and helps revise the plan. A person checks safety, constraints and important local facts; material claims need traceable sources.
Guardrails
Critical factual errors and infeasible constraints. Accepting an itinerary does not prove a completed trip or revenue.
Decision after the test
We decide whether the use case is useful enough for further development and a separate monetisation test.
EXP 04Proposed hypothesis

GRI × GTM · AI economics

Which AI is worth the investment?

Can diagnosing a business constraint help select AI use cases with measurable economic value after all incremental costs?

Primary metric
Incremental profit contribution
Methodology and library →
How we will test it
Supporting metrics
Payback period · Pilot cost
Business problem
Choosing technology before defining the business problem can produce working automation with no clear economic contribution.
Comparison and test design
We record the baseline, main business constraint and one GTM hypothesis. The manager approves the budget, primary metric and stopping rules. Where feasible, we use a control group or phased rollout. We include integration, data, AI usage, training and human review in costs.
AI and human roles
AI supports analysis and proposed actions. A manager owns the budget, measurement quality and final decision; an accountable specialist checks financial conclusions.
Guardrails
Data quality, operational risk and budget overruns. Where incremental impact cannot be estimated reliably, report uncertainty rather than attributing all process revenue to AI.
Decision after the test
We scale, change or stop the selected use case. One pilot does not establish the superiority of the entire GRI methodology; long payback periods require continued observation.
EXP 05Proposed hypothesis

Human × AI · B2B and services

When does AI make humans better?

Can the right division of work between AI and people improve productivity while preserving customer trust and service quality?

Primary metric
Quality-adjusted tasks per hour
Business challenges in the library →
How we will test it
Supporting metrics
Resolution time · Error rate
Business problem
Automation may speed up a response while creating errors, repeat contacts and additional work for the team.
Comparison and test design
We will compare ordinary work with AI-assisted work on similar B2B or service tasks. Before the test, we will define the quality standard, task complexity and cases requiring a human handoff.
AI and human roles
AI prepares a response or action; a person checks consequential decisions. People own customer commitments, exceptions and final execution.
Guardrails
Errors, repeat contacts, customer satisfaction and policy violations. Speed without quality is not an improvement.
Decision after the test
We identify what can be automated, what to leave to specialists and where human review is mandatory.
NEXTOpen call

Your business challenge could be our next experiment.

Where is your company losing customers, time or profit? Together, we can define a testable hypothesis, meaningful metrics and the right pilot approach.

Propose a business hypothesis →

The outcome determines the observation window

A 21-day test can assess a bounded workflow change. A 90-day business pilot includes baseline measurement, implementation and economic evaluation. Repeat purchases may require 90–180 days or more. These are planning horizons, not promises of results.

What we will publish after testing

Baseline, comparison method, period, sample size, costs, limitations and the decision. Before launch, we define the primary metric, minimum meaningful effect and stopping rules. A null or negative result can still support a useful decision.

Strong people.Bold hypotheses.Real results.

We bring different kinds of expertise to one challenge. Market knowledge, product, technology and research come together to turn a strong idea into a tested solution.

We start with a challenge, a role and a way to contribute.
  1. 01Business challenge

    We find where value is lost

  2. 02People × hypothesis

    We connect expertise and a testable idea

  3. 03Test → value

    We measure the effect and make a decision

HONOR · 1 MLN KM · YOUR CHALLENGE

Marina Rakhimzhanova

Venture Builder · Founder of AIStart360

Portrait of Marina Ra
AI × GTMInternational projects

Marina brings together opportunities, people with different expertise and ideas that can be tested in business. Technology supports that work; the value lies in the outcome for the customer.

More than 15 years of experience across retail, SaaS, FMCG, finance, pharma, logistics and technology projects in Central Asia.

+300%year-over-year growth in one project
×2revenue growth to ≈ ₸2.5B
25people in the sales team built
More about Marina

Regional ecosystem

Choose a location for a future Bootcamp.

We are developing six locations and gathering interest from companies and local partners. Dates, venues and participation terms will be published once a launch is confirmed.

Learning and professional resources
11 /Kazakhstan and Central Asia contextWe account for the region’s market, teams and customer behaviour.Read moreShow less

AI implementation grounded in Kazakhstan’s real business context.

We work with companies in Kazakhstan and Central Asia to move from AI interest to a measurable operating result—through customer evidence, workflow redesign and controlled field experiments.

01

AI readiness × growth

We diagnose the customer, data, process and organizational conditions that determine whether an AI use case can create value.

02

90-day business pilot

We select one high-value hypothesis, define a baseline and KPI, test the Human × AI workflow and make a Scale / Iterate / Stop decision.

03

GTM and customer experience

We connect AI to a real customer mission, adoption mechanism, commercial metric and go-to-market plan.

Almaty · Astana · Kazakhstan · Uzbekistan · Central Asia

Let’s discuss your challenge in 20 minutes.

Tell us where your business is losing customers, time or money. We will clarify the challenge and identify a next step: an analysis, an experiment or an action your own team can test.

An introductory conversation about one issue. A full audit and implementation plan are a separate engagement. Choose a time and receive confirmation through TidyCal.
Ask a question

RA LAB / LIBRARY

Sign in to download materials

Create an account or sign in to download files, templates, plans and calculations. After signing in, return to the material and select Download.

The site owner can see your name, email, material and download time. Plan answers and calculation inputs are not included in this history.